Wednesday, December 09, 2009

I Blame Phil Donahue
If you don't know Phil Donahue or the Phil Donahue Show then you probably don't remember a time when you had to find a pay phone to call home. The Phil Donahue Show still holds the record for the longest continuous run of any syndicated talk show in U.S. television history. (Deal with that Oprah). His was the first talk show to have "controversial" guests on. There would be the cross dresser or the atheist or the occasional sex addict, tame by the guest list on the Jerry Springer Show today, but pushing it in the 70's and 80's. Phil is intelligent and could take a neutral position as host that was provocative, but not aggressive or insulting to his guests. But because of his success and innovations he may have ushered in an era of opinionated rudeness that thrives today.

After his interview he would take a microphone out into the crowd and let the audience ask questions of the guest. That was something new. Usually an audience was just there as a passive observer, the object of the discourse not a participant. It was a brilliant segment of the show at the time, but it was of a different time. More than a decade after his show ended and as that idea has been repeated by less able hosts it has degraded into an insult-fest of mudslinging and uncivilized rudeness.

The bastard seed of that brilliance gave birth to the Jerry Springer Show and Bill O'Reiley insult journalism. Audiences now feel they have the right and the misguided duty to comment on anything and everything they see and hear. Phil allowed the audience to ask questions. The narcissism of the crowd soon turned those questions into opinion and insults.

We have now become a society of commentors. We comment on anything and everything. Nothing is too complicated, too sensitive nor too personal that perfect strangers don't feel free to express their opinion about it. Every FaceBook action has a "comment" button, every editorial an email address and every radio station a call in number. And these comments are not for the most part researched, informed, intelligent opinions just a knee jerk ( I use the word jerk in all its contexts) reaction of "OMG WTF are you stupid?" I have written about this before in a previous blog on rudeness, but this rudeness has been born out of misguided sense of entitlement.

Maybe it is wrong to totally blame Phil. He may have invented the idea but others exploited it. He was smart and his audiences were smart back then. The IQ of the average Jerry Springer audience today is equivalent to pond algae. And Phil did, after all, have the good sense to go off the air in 1996 long before the Bush years when everyone knew they were smarter than the President.

I doubt we can get the genie back in the bottle, its sort of a free speech issue and everyone is entitled to an opinion. You can even have an opinion about an opinion, you can comment on a comment. Soon perhaps nothing will be taken as knowledge or truth just a stupid idea by some cloistered thinker with too much time on his hands...... WTF Mr. Plato?
As you were,
Jay

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I've ranted on this myself.

Thing is, people are allowed to wear masks.
They can pass sophomoric judgment...be "experts without portfolio"...and suffer no consequences, because they don't use their own names.
So the id comes out to play.

Now, I think masks might be useful in open forums and in blog comments, simply because you don't know what kind of freak might be passing by, read what you said, and stalk you at home.

But if a poster is allowed to wear a mask, s/he should be thankful for the privilege and comment responsibly.

That's the thing: There are no consequences for mean-spirited comments, because the one who comments can't be found.

When I first started reading blogs and chat boards on the internet, I was appalled to discover how much meanness and ignorance (and, wow, you wanna talk about racism!) lives among us...kept backstage because it's not good business.

And, no, there's probably no cure.

But it sure is disappointing to discover this about humanity.

I'll get down off my soapbox now, Jay. I'm posting "anonymously," but I'm signing my name, anyway.


-Philip

Bob Conrad said...

No comment! (just kidding)

Fad23 said...

It seems to me that a major difference between Phil Donahue's and Jerry Springer's shows is the intent of the producers. One consideration in any talk show is that the questioners are very likely filtered before they are allowed their to ask questions on tape.

I don't believe for a second that folks shouldn't be allowed to comment on things that they see. However, I am sure that there is a huge difference between a heckle and a legitimate criticism.

I also don't believe that a person need have accreditation to have their opinion or reaction to be valid. However any reactions in a public forum should be scrutinized and challenged as much as the initial statements.

Isn't it all about the signal-to-noise ratio?

Neale Bacon said...

reminds me of the Steve Allen book "Vulgarians at the Gate"

Anonymous said...

Lets not forget Oberman and his sidekick Maddow. Come to think of it, they very rarely have guests with an opposing view anyway.


Troy